Issue #11 — The Candy Shop That Changed Everything

Looking for your next stock idea?

MarketBeat’s Top 5 Stocks report highlights five companies carrying some of Wall Street’s strongest consensus analyst ratings.

These aren’t lightly followed stocks, either. Every company is worth at least $5 billion and has been rated by 10 or more analysts within the past 12 months.

For each stock, you’ll see both the bull case and bear case, based on recent news and MarketBeat financial data, so you can weigh the opportunity and the risks before deciding whether it belongs on your watchlist.

See which five stocks made the list and get the full report free.

See the Top 5

Key Takeaways

Most of Buffett’s shareholder letters are letters. But every so often, he does something different. He writes an essay inside the letter — a formal, standalone piece of thinking so important it deserves its own section.

The 1983 letter contains one of these essays, and it may be the single most important one he ever wrote. The title: “Goodwill and its Amortization: The Rules and the Realities.” Dull-sounding. World-changing.

Because this is the essay where Buffett formally graduated from one era of his investing career to the next.

By 1983, Berkshire owned two businesses that posed a strange accounting problem.

See’s Candies. Berkshire paid $25 million for See’s in 1972. On its balance sheet, See’s had tangible net assets of about $8 million. So Berkshire paid roughly $17 million more than the business’s accounting value. By the strict Graham-style rules Buffett had grown up with, this looked like a mistake. You never pay 3x book value for a candy shop.

Buffalo News. Same story. Berkshire paid $35.5 million for the Buffalo Evening News in 1977 — again, far more than the tangible book value of what was essentially a printing press and some buildings.

And yet by 1983, both businesses were performing spectacularly. But Berkshire’s accounting didn’t show it clearly, because the “goodwill” Berkshire paid above book value was being slowly amortized away on the income statement, making reported earnings look worse than they really were.

Buffett was annoyed. The accounting was lying. So he wrote the essay.

When one company buys another for more than its tangible book value, the difference gets recorded on the balance sheet as goodwill. Under the accounting rules of the time, this had to be slowly amortized — written down bit by bit every year — reducing reported earnings even though no actual cash was leaving the business.

So See’s reported earnings looked lower than its real cash earnings. Buffalo News the same. Buffett considered this flat-out misleading. The amortization wasn’t a real cost. It was a bookkeeping entry pretending to be one.

Here’s the key reframe — and it’s the whole point of the essay.

Economic goodwill isn’t an accounting number. It’s the real-world premium a great business commands because of its intangible advantages:

A business with real economic goodwill can earn extraordinary returns on tangible capital.

Buffett’s example from the 1983 letter: See’s Candies was earning about $13 million per year on tangible net assets of just $20 million. That’s a return on tangible capital of roughly 65%.

Sixty-five percent.

For comparison, the average American business was earning around 12% on equity at the time. See’s was earning five times that on its tangible assets. The only possible explanation was something intangible — the brand, the pricing power, the gift-giving ritual customers trusted.

That’s economic goodwill. And it’s worth paying for.

Buffett added one more observation that makes economic goodwill even more valuable than it looks.

In an inflationary period, every business needs more capital just to maintain itself — inventory costs more, equipment costs more, everything in the balance sheet inflates with the price level. For a capital-intensive business, this is a disaster (we covered this in Issue #8).

But a business with high economic goodwill doesn’t need much tangible capital at all. See’s didn’t buy new factories to raise prices. It just raised prices. The economic goodwill compounded in nominal value with inflation while requiring almost no new investment.

That makes economic goodwill the ultimate inflation defense. And it’s why Buffett was willing to pay what looked like a crazy premium for See’s in 1972. He wasn’t buying $8 million of candy equipment. He was buying $20 million of annual earnings that would grow with inflation and need almost no new capital to do so.

Reading this essay, you start to see Buffett dividing every business in the world into two broad categories.

Category 1 — Real economic goodwill. High returns on tangible capital. Can raise prices with inflation. Little reinvestment needed. See’s. Coca-Cola. American Express. Apple. Moody’s. Worth far more than their tangible book value.

Category 2 — No economic goodwill. Modest or poor returns on tangible capital. Needs constant reinvestment to stand still. Can’t raise prices without losing customers. Textiles. Airlines. Most commodity producers. Worth roughly their tangible book value, sometimes less.

The old Graham approach said: buy anything selling below its tangible book value, because the asset backing protects you.

The new Buffett approach, from See’s onward, said: buy businesses with real economic goodwill at reasonable prices, because the compounding of their above-average returns is worth far more than any asset backing could ever be.

This is the single most important shift in Buffett’s career. See’s taught him the lesson. The 1983 essay is where he wrote it down for everyone else.

Three practical applications:

1. Compute return on tangible capital for any business you own.
Not return on reported book value — strip out intangibles and goodwill first. If a business is earning 25%+ on tangible capital year after year, it has real economic goodwill. If it’s earning 8-12%, it probably doesn’t. This is the single most useful ratio in franchise investing.

2. Be willing to pay above book value for genuine franchises.
The old instinct is “never pay above book.” The post-See’s instinct is “pay above book for businesses whose economic goodwill will keep compounding.” The hard part is telling the two apart — and point 1 is how you do it.

3. Distrust reported earnings when amortization is large.
Many modern businesses carry huge non-cash amortization charges from past acquisitions. These depress reported earnings without consuming any cash. Look at cash earnings — or earnings before amortization of acquired intangibles — for a truer picture of what the business is actually producing.

From the 1983 essay:

The accounting said those businesses were underwhelming. The economics said they were extraordinary. Buffett was telling shareholders — and the whole investing world — to pay attention to the second, not the first.

Once you can tell the difference, you can see franchises nobody else is pricing correctly.

Issue #12 — Season 2 Finale: The Owner’s Manual, Complete
We’ll pull together everything from Season 2 — the acquisition criteria, the misery index, the Owner’s Manual principles, Mr. Market, and economic goodwill — into one framework for how Buffett formally codified his approach between 1981 and 1988. Then Season 3 opens, and we move into the 1990s — moats, Coca-Cola, the dot-com years, and the sharpest version of Buffett at the peak of his powers.

Read more about SpaceX IPO here

Something has quietly changed in energy.

Supply tighter, demand steady.

LNG exporters, pipelines, infrastructure getting paid on volume.

With AI data centers climbing gas demand and export capacity expanding, cash flow grows.

This briefing breaks down steady producers, midstream players, export names quietly compounding while tech obsesses over headlines.

Get the Free Briefing

_{By clicking, you’ll receive this and other Elite Trade Media LLC financial newsletters, which may include advertiser offers. Publications · Privacy · Unsubscribe anytime.}

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in securities involves risk, including the potential loss of principal; always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.